Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Giles Hussey vs Alexis Canter Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hussey vs Canter analysis and find out who is favored!
Giles Hussey vs Alexis Canter Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hussey has won 53.02% of points on his second serve, while Canter has won 51.86%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hussey, in recent form, has won 54.53% of his opponent's second serve points, while Canter has won 47.87%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.89% and 29.28% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hussey has saved 63.3% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Canter has saved 55.42% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hussey has won 69.05% of matches played (W/L 58/ 26), with Canter winning 47.06% (W/L 16/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hussey has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 86/ 42), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 20% (W/L 2/ 8). Canter has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 132/ 110), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 4/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Hussey has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 75% of matches (W/L 54/ 18), where as Canter has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 48.48% of matches (W/L 16/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hussey has played against opponents with an average rank of 168.92 while Canter has played against players with an average rank of 86.56.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hussey has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Canter has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hussey has converted 46.65% of breakpoint opportunities, and Canter has converted 52.5% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hussey 0 - 0 Canter
355
Rank
355
High
26
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
886
Rank
773
High
25
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
64% (144-81)
Career Total W/L
51% (186-177)
74% (28-10)
YTD W/L
56% (9-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
3
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Giles Hussey | Alexis Canter |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 74% (28/10) | 56% (9/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 70% (63/27) | 57% (20/15) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (472/360) | 53% (191/172) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 78% (28/8) | 67% (4/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 50% (5/5) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.22 | 0.39 |
| Aces Total | 88 | 68 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.06 |
| DFs Total | 80 | 11 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:35 | 1:23:53 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 156.92 | 67.38 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (1687/2548) | 66% (609/919) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (1116/1687) | 72% (440/609) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 54% (462/861) | 54% (167/310) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (138/301) | 62% (36/58) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (1125/2569) | 36% (306/858) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 78% (28/8) | 60% (9/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 75% (27/36) | 56% (9/16) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 89% (8/9) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (7/14) | 33% (1/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 82% (28/23) | 82% (11/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 18% (28/5) | 18% (11/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (10/5) | 0% (5/0) |
Giles Hussey Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Blake Mott
Player
Giles Hussey
87%
(
67 of
77)
1st Serve %
72%
(
63 of
88)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Ryuki Matsuda
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Marek Gengel
70%
(
64 of
91)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
87
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Giles Hussey
62%
(
56 of
91)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
97)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
46%
(
42 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
97)
94
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Robin Bertrand
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve %
75%
(
49 of
65)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Harry Wendelken
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Enzo Wallart
81%
(
50 of
62)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
8
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Lukas Pokorny
Player
Giles Hussey
67%
(
58 of
86)
1st Serve %
75%
(
62 of
83)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
43%
(
37 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
84
|
6-7(5) 7-5 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Alex Knaff
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
7
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-0 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Joshua Sheehy
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
18%
(
3 of
17)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Alexis Canter Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Alexis Canter
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexis Canter
Player
Harry Wendelken
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
7
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
20 of
52)
68
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexis Canter
Player
Zechariah Hamrouni
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve %
69%
(
31 of
45)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
16 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexis Canter
Player
Sean Hodkin
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Toby Martin
Player
Alexis Canter
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
75%
(
49 of
65)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
59
Total Points Won
55
|
6-7(5) 6-4 12-10 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexis Canter
Player
James Beaven
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Alexis Canter
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
7
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
2
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexis Canter
Player
Carlo Alberto Fossati
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
8
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
24 of
28)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
16 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexis Canter
Player
Thomas Mathys
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
22%
(
11 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Oscar Lacides
Player
Alexis Canter
45%
(
27 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Hussey Vs Canter Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
